The way we see work has been undergoing fundamental changes because of the influence of digitalisation, the trend towards greater flexibility and mobility, and Generations Y and Z’s values. The rational performance society of the industrial age (with overtime, competitive pressure and fixed attendance times) has proven to be unsustainable. Various new-work models have been rapidly gaining ground, especially as a result of the Covid pandemic.
Values such as income level or status are less relevant for generations Y and Z, who expect employers to provide for values such as meaningfulness, creative opportunities and work-life balance.
People have been talking about work-life balance for a long time and the term is already part of the standard HR vocabulary. Work-life balance means a person’s private life and work are clearly separate from each other. The “balance” in this context is an equilibrium. In short, it is about finding a balance between private life and work. By creating a clearer division between work and private life (a stricter work-life balance), employees feel they have more options and control over their lives. With a good work-life balance, employees are more capable on the job and less stressed.
Another positive side effect is that, since employees develop less stress, they have fewer sick and absence days. This is particularly relevant in the context of there being a shortage of skilled workers and of increasing sick leave for psychological reasons.
The work-life balance model offers the following advantages, among others:
While the work-life balance model has some advantages, there are also some disadvantages:
In contrast to work-life balance, work-life blending does not separate private and professional life but instead mixes them. Clear boundaries and areas are broken down and work and private life are merged. For example, work is also undertaken in one’s free time, in front of the TV on the couch in the evening, because a good thought has just popped into one’s head. This flexibility at work means that private appointments, e.g. at the car mechanic’s or the bank, can be easily met during the day.
As long as the work-life blending model is well supported by supervisors, it offers various advantages:
The work-life blending model offers many advantages, not only for employees. Employers can also benefit from the model since there is no waiting over several days for email replies from part-time employees; as a rule, they return important replies earlier.
In addition, employers can expect to counteract a high turnover rate through increased employee satisfaction. This can save a lot of time and resources, especially in sectors with high turnover rates.
In addition to the opportunities, blending also entails certain risks:
Studies show that many workers today have problems with the work-life blending model. 37% of respondents said they do not have clear start and end times for their work assignments and projects. This unsettles many respondents so much that they cannot switch off even after their actual working hours.
In contrast to the work-life balance, where professional and private are clearly separated, the work-life blending model mixes work and private life. Professional tasks and projects are merged with family and time for oneself.
The work-life blending model is much more in line with the trend towards greater flexibility and mobility than the work-life balance model. However, work-life blending involves significantly less employee control, which in turn could lead to greater health risks than work-life balance.
Regardless of whether work-life blending or work-life balance will prevail in the labour market, it is important for companies to bear in mind that working environments must always be flexible and dynamically adaptable to all requirements, that there is no one right model for everyone and that good cooperation and exchange between employees and managers are enormously important. Cooperation only works with good communication, regardless of work-life blending or balancing.